@prefix rdf: . @prefix prodotto: . @prefix retescientifica: . prodotto:ID93719 rdf:type retescientifica:ProdottoDellaRicerca , prodotto:TIPO1301 . @prefix rdfs: . prodotto:ID93719 rdfs:label "Facing the inevitable? The dynamics of impasse in collective contexts (Contributo in atti di convegno)"@en . @prefix xsd: . @prefix pubblicazioni: . prodotto:ID93719 pubblicazioni:anno "2010-01-01T00:00:00+01:00"^^xsd:gYear . @prefix skos: . prodotto:ID93719 skos:altLabel "
Bottazzi, E., Ferrario, R. (2010)
Facing the inevitable? The dynamics of impasse in collective contexts
in Collective Intentionality VII, Basel, Switzerland, 23-26/08/2010
"^^rdf:HTML ; pubblicazioni:autori "Bottazzi, E., Ferrario, R."^^xsd:string ; pubblicazioni:affiliazioni "ISTC - Sede di Trento"^^xsd:string ; pubblicazioni:titolo "Facing the inevitable? The dynamics of impasse in collective contexts"^^xsd:string . @prefix prodottidellaricerca: . prodotto:ID93719 prodottidellaricerca:abstract "This contribution aims at showing some of the advantages of taking a novel, broad and sys- temic view on constitutive rules based on a failure oriented analysis, relying on the notion of impasse. Basically, impasses can descend by two main kinds of causes: either a mismatch be- tween rules (how things should be done) and facts (how things are actually done), or an inter- nal contradiction among rules. Given the definitional character of constitutive rules, one could say that they set a new \\\"logical space\\\" for action, and that impasses (both mismatches and internal contradictions) push the action out of such space, thus threatening the identity of the regulated interaction and coordination.\nIt is fairly clear that impasses may endanger the life of an institution; on the other hand, in a lot of other situations similar issues can arise in systems of constitutive rules that are not fatal to them. The main claim here is that, in order to understand such situations, an analysis of the dynamic evolution of impasses from definitional to institutional, in social settings is neces- sary. What the proposed analysis will show is a stepwise process towards the \\\"institutionaliza- tion\\\" of the impasse.\nBoth definitional and institutional impasses can be said to be ontological, though each in a different sense. What makes definitional impasse ontological are the rules of the institution, while what makes institutional impasse real and unavoidable is a mechanism of social recog- nition.\nWhile definitional impasse can be overcome without changing the rules, with institutional impasse agents necessarily face two alternative possibilities: either the death of the institution, in case it is not possible to find a meaningful coordination; or the change of the rules of the institution, in order to preserve its very identity."@en . @prefix modulo: . prodotto:ID93719 prodottidellaricerca:prodottoDi modulo:ID2059 . @prefix istituto: . prodotto:ID93719 prodottidellaricerca:prodottoDi istituto:CDS078 . @prefix unitaDiPersonaleEsterno: . prodotto:ID93719 pubblicazioni:autoreCNR unitaDiPersonaleEsterno:ID93 . @prefix unitaDiPersonaleInterno: . prodotto:ID93719 pubblicazioni:autoreCNR unitaDiPersonaleInterno:MATRICOLA10529 . unitaDiPersonaleInterno:MATRICOLA10529 pubblicazioni:autoreCNRDi prodotto:ID93719 . istituto:CDS078 prodottidellaricerca:prodotto prodotto:ID93719 . unitaDiPersonaleEsterno:ID93 pubblicazioni:autoreCNRDi prodotto:ID93719 . modulo:ID2059 prodottidellaricerca:prodotto prodotto:ID93719 .